Opinion: Distortion and Censorship of Scientific Inquiry Brings Harm to Society

Science abides by scientific methods. The scientific method is used in all areas of life that necessitate the presence of facts to guide us in making informed decisions. The scientific approach involves the collection of reliable and objective data with which to verify or reject hypotheses. Censorship of information is not a part of scientific inquiry and defies mandatory requirements for transparency. Instead, there must be free and open debate in order to objectively evaluate data.

* * *

Doctors Against Forced Organ Harvesting (DAFOH) is committed to promoting the highest standards in the ethical practice of medicine as well as the physical, mental, and spiritual well-being of all people. For nearly fifteen years, members of DAFOH have investigated and reported on state-sanctioned, forced organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience in China. Forced organ harvesting, the killing of people for their organs, is the most egregious and abhorrent abuse of the medical profession in history. This practice stands in direct defiance of universally accepted ethical standards and laws.

Multiple sources of evidence, including the 2019 judgement by the China Tribunal, have demonstrated that the sudden expansion of China’s transplant medicine since 1999 has been made possible by organs obtained from nonconsenting, living prisoners of conscience, primarily Falun Gong practitioners.

DAFOH has observed the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) practice of insidious infiltration and subversion of global institutions of all kinds. Its strategies of deception around the world have resulted in government officials, international health organizations, global media companies, educational institutions, and corporations being co-opted to enable the coverup of illegal and unethical transplant practices. The illicit actions taken by the CCP represent a dangerous form of distortion and censorship of scientific inquiry.

The same pattern of malevolent misinformation and covert actions contributed substantially to the rise of the global pandemic. When the novel coronavirus first appeared in Wuhan, the CCP breached global ethical standards by silencing whistleblowers, blocking the exchange of vital scientific information, refusing independent inspections, and covering up the human-to-human transmissibility of the virus.

In January and February of 2020, Chinese officials placed Wuhan under strict quarantine and according to the TomTom Traffic Index, dramatically curtailed domestic travel inside the mainland while encouraging international airline traffic, facilitating global transmission of the virus.

When mortality rates began to climb in Western countries, given the ongoing lack of transparency from the Chinese regime and incomplete scientific data, world leaders began putting draconian lockdown and social distancing measures into place. As scientific and clinical evidence began to emerge regarding the nature of the virus and the efficacy of various treatment protocols, scientific discussion and credible data were selectively censored, effectively undermining the true mission of science.

Initially, governmental leaders acted with limited knowledge. Subsequent scientific inquiry has presented differing views regarding the utility of societal lockdowns and the implementation of social distancing measures. As the body of scientific knowledge has grown, responses from those in positions of authority have been inconsistent, ranging from acceptance and application of valid new data to willful blindness in continuing potentially harmful policies.

Open scientific discussion and widespread adoption of strategies based on reliable scientific information could have resulted in improved treatments for the virus and better clinical outcomes. For instance, the CDC reported a 99.997% survival rate of infected school students, yet schools remained closed in many places while rates of suicide, drug use, and child abuse increased. School closures led to more harm to students than the virus itself. More responsible leadership would respond to new independent scientific advice for the betterment of society, rather than follow untenable policies.

The decay of scientific rigor in the analysis of data surrounding forced organ harvesting and the global pandemic is also reflected by improprieties that influenced the landscape of the U.S. presidential election. These indiscretions have created significant conflict in society and generated concern for the well-being of Americans and the sovereignty of their nation.

Foreign influence over the U.S. presidential election was well established long before the Dominion voting software company was purchased by Chinese business partners in the weeks leading up to November 3, 2020. This likely allowed access to and manipulation of voting results both on and after election day as exemplified by the improbability of having 99.4% of the 600,000 overnight votes in Pennsylvania being cast for only one candidate. Ballots were fabricated and counterfeited while thousands of dead people were counted as having voted.

The sudden spike of votes after midnight in several states followed a pattern that we observed in the one-day spike of organ donor registration numbers in China on December 31, 2015 and again in the last week of December 2016.

(Source: https://votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020)
(Source: DAFOH)









The scientific method is a reflection of rational thinking and common sense. When scientific rules and statistical methods are applied, truth emerges, and reasonable, effective approaches can be implemented. China’s transplant numbers are implausible and can only be explained by forced organ harvesting. The risks and benefits of global lockdowns, social distancing, and face masks need to be comprehensively assessed vis a vis their impact on medical, social, and economic outcomes. The recent emergence of objective data related to the 2020 U.S. presidential election, demonstrating statistically flawed and fraudulent results, requires transparent and unbiased scientific analysis.

In conclusion, the hallmark of ethical science is the acceptance of differing opinions with tolerance and civility without fear of open and honest discussion. Ignoring scientific methods, statistics, and logic derived from acquired knowledge foments chaos and confusion. Such tactics have enabled the CCP to create circumstances that have allowed it to thrive and pursue its stealth infiltration of other countries. The silencing and censoring of dissenting voices reflect biases that are antithetical to the wellbeing of human society.

Misinformation and censorship are used to coverup what is harmful to the people.
Transparency and truth pave the path to blessings for the people.